The book is by Jon Halliday and Jung Chang.
I think it illustrates that Mao can be read, in addition to having aspergers, as having a simplifying iq bound to the will of a narcissistic personality disorder, that is, the attitude that the only narrative is theirs, that their rightness or their wrongness is always the issue, and that blaming comes in a process which comes before the situation is analysed.
It is also intersting that the guerrilla war things he did were really ways of avoiding risk and commitments that he could be judged on later, and that he could judge others on later, i.e. a leap to the sidelines.
When not doing that he advocated simple chaos and reversals of sense to take ownership of the order to follow.
His adherence to Marxism is like an adherence to Ezra Poundism. You say whatever you think it is that justifies your literal self.
It took an apocalypse for people to believe that, and a coterie of other personalities seeking daddies.
I think it is a great murderous fear of an undergrad student gone monstrous. A mommy's boy with no mommy. It seems that a narrow world, confined to his owm bed, was needed justified by denying the legitamacy of the rest. Competitive with reality.
And let's face it, a bad poet.
God, narratives, when will we be free of them!